British Columbia
Cycling Coalition

 

Who We Are

What We Do

Library

Links

 

last modified July 3, 2003

I Shot the Sherfiff but I did not Shoot the Deputy

Cycling and the Law - Article #3

by David Hay

In my last article I addressed the difference between statute law (legislation) and judge made law (i.e. the common law). Here is an illustration of how this works.

Joe Sunday, our man of leisure, had not been on his bike for years. He loved to drive into work in his spacious utility vehicle. It gave him time alone. He was ill prepared for the transit strike but he also made adaptation to any circumstance a point of pride. So without misgiving he dug his wife's bicycle out of the garage and adjusted the seat in preparation for combat.

Joe never really understood why it became illegal in many jurisdictions to ride on the sidewalk. After all, he didn't even think small vehicles had a place on the road, let alone bicycles. So when he tucked his pant legs into his socks that morning, he had no intention of riding to work on the road and endangering his life, but looked forward to the tranquillity of the sidewalk.

Five minutes into his ride and everything was going well. Starbuck's in his right hand, left hand covering the front brake, he felt a new sense of exhilaration.

A vehicle came up from behind him, travelling very fast, and reminded him why he rode on the sidewalk. The vehicle sped past him and cranked a hard right turn into an alleyway directly in front of him. He hit his front brake and catapulted into the side of the vehicle.

Joe Sunday's next memory was the smell of alcohol. He stared up at his assailant, who had the unmitigated audacity to ask, "don't you know it's illegal to ride on a sidewalk?", whereupon Joe Sunday passed out.

Despite Joe Sunday being in clear violation of a by law prohibiting riding on a sidewalk, that breach is not determinative of his rights to pursue the wrongdoer in negligence. It may be in any given case that the wrongdoer can say, in reply to an allegation of negligence, that he could not have known a cyclist would be on the sidewalk. That is to say, it was not foreseeable that someone would be breaking the law. However, in our case the drunk driver had later told the police that he could not even remember making a right turn and was not even aware there was a sidewalk in the area. On these facts, Joe Sunday's breach of the by law would, strictly speaking, not be relevant. His shooting the sheriff did not contribute to the death of the deputy.

David Hay is a litigation lawyer and partner at Richards Buell Sutton LLP. RBS is a full-service law firm in Vancouver delivering legal advice and solutions in all areas of practice. The information above is not legal advice. Anyone seeking legal advice should contact David directly.

Back to Cycling and the Law Introduction

TOP