Cycling should be safe, convenient and enjoyable for all my family and friends
I agree

Cycling Routes Should be Direct, Obvious & Separated from Traffic

To encourage cycling, bicycle routes should be as direct and obvious as possible. Direct routes require less effort and make cycling competitive with driving for a greater number of trips. Exposure to rain, heat, snow and cold is also less for shorter trips. 

Complete networks of all ages and abilities obvious direct bike routes do cost money. That is why we recommending that the BC Government invest $1 billion over ten years to enable everyone to cycle for their daily trips in every season. Please sign the petition.

People just taking up cycling and visitors will likely not find convoluted out of the way routes. Even people familiar with a route will miss a turn once every so often while newbies may miss turns all together ending up lost or in an environment not great to cycle in. While signs help, they are easy to miss. Now, in specific circumstances, longer routes may  be better if they decrease cycling effort and time by avoiding hills and stops.

The Cycling in Cities research found that two of the top motivators for cycling are:

  • The distance to your destination is less than 5 km
  • Cycling to the destination takes less time than traveling by other modes

Of no surprise, the number one deterrent to cycling is safety concerns. In particular, most people won’t cycle on busy streets where there is no separation from motor vehicles.  More often than not, main streets are main streets because they are direct and flat. Because they are main streets, popular destinations including shopping, businesses, transit stations and homes are built along them. Thus, in the majority of instances, the best approach is to build separated bike lanes to protect the cyclists from the traffic thus making the direct route safe for cyclists of all ages.

This approach is confirmed by the Cycling in Cities Motivators and Deterrence research which found that people prefer bicycle paths along major streets over traffic calmed residential streets.

Unfortunately, often there is an tendency to attempt to divert cyclists along circuitous routes on streets with low levels of traffic. These attempts are rarely successful in attracting high volumes of people on bicycles.

The importance of directness is confirmed by other many studies and best practices documents including those below.

From Urban Adaptation - The bicycle as urban transport – learning from cycle cities:

2. Safety and directness

The perceived risk of injury is the foremost reason why cycling is unappealing in our cities. Likewise, commuters desire an efficient means of transport, from their door to their destination, and will choose accordingly. Bicycle infrastructure must be as safe and direct as possible. At the network level directness is paramount. In the past both Copenhagen and Berlin have embarked on the back street strategy. This strategy ultimately failed in both cities. The reason is simple – back streets are neither direct or visible. Some used the new higher quality back street facilities, however the vast majority of cyclists refused to deviate from the more direct routes.

At the detail level, two points must be remembered; Firstly, bicycle paths must be physically separated. From both motor vehicles and pedestrians.

The Dutch Reference Study - Cases of interventions in bicycle infrastructure reviewed in the framework of Bikeability (page 25):

Conclusions at route level:

  • Given the fact that cyclists are hardly willing to make detours, the design of bicycle routes should offer connections that are as direct as possible between origin and destination. Combined with the preference of cyclists for segregated facilities, the implication is that if a heavily used arterial provides the shortest connection for cyclists, these arterials should have segregated cycle tracks.
  • However, routes along arterials have some disadvantages, such as the experience of noise and emissions, traffic lights that often aren‟t well adjusted to the needs of cyclists, and the risk of collisions with turning motor traffic. So if direct connections can be made through traffic calmed areas, this is the preferred option.
  • Another finding of the research was the importance of a logical tracing of the various links of the bicycle route. If the tracing of the route is unclear, cyclists get „lost‟. Thus, coherence is an important requirement for cycling infrastructure.

Distance, slope, and turns

All else equal, a 1 percent increase in distance reduces the probability of choosing a route by about 5 percent and 9 percent for non-commute and commute trips respectively. That cyclists are highly sensitive to distance is consistent with the observed data. Half of all observed trips were less than 10 percent longer than the shortest path and 95 percent of trips were less than 50 percent longer.

Turns likely delay cyclists, and they also add the mental cost of having to  remember the correct sequence of turns. As expected, turn frequency is a significant negative factor in route choice. In the case of turns, for instance, the model predicts that an additional turn per mile (0.6 turns/km) is equal to a 7.4 percent increase in non-commute distance and a 4.2 percent increase in commute distance.

Non-commute Versus Commute Trip
In general, the model suggests that commuting cyclists are relatively more sensitive to distance and less sensitive to most other variables. Commuting cyclists are likely under greater time pressure to reach their destination in the work direction.

Complete networks of all ages and abilities direct bike routes do cost money. That is why we recommending that the BC Government invest $1 billion over ten years to enable everyone to cycle for their daily trips in every season. Please sign the petition.

The Latest

Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.

A Billion for Bikes - Cycling for Everyone Petition

I call upon the Government of BC to enable everyone in BC to cycle & walk in safety as part of their daily lives by implementing an Active Transportation Strategy that includes:

  • Investing $1 billion over the next ten years to:
    • Upgrade cycling & walking facilities on provincial roads & bridges
    • Complete cycling & walking networks in communities across BC
    • Provide safe routes to school for children
    • Build trails & routes for cycling & walking tourism
  • Ensuring that paths & protected bike lanes can be safely shared by people using wheelchairs, skateboards & in-line skates
  • Enhancing cycling education for children & adults
  • Promoting cycling & walking
  • Encouraging electric bike use by eliminating the PST & providing rebates
778 needed to reach 6,000

Will you sign?

or Text SIGN to +16046704421 to sign

Support Our Cycling & Walking for Everyone Campaign

Cycling For Everyone

Your generous contribution will help us mobilize the support needed to convince the Provincial and Federal Governments to make bold investments in cycling & walking through:

  • Outreach to organizations and businesses 
  • Petitioning to show the government that a lot of people support better cycling
  • Meeting with politicians and staff
  • Press releases and op-eds

Please support our efforts by making an on-going contribution of $5, $10, $15 or $20 per month or a one-time donation.


Help show lots of people in BC support cycling and walking for everyone.

Please share. Encourage your friends and family to sign the petition!

Sign the Petition

Our Members

Become an Organizational Member